Nilai manfaat ekonomi daerah aliran Sungai Oyo Kabupaten Gunungkidul

  • Obed Juan Benito Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Adib Wahyu Purwaningrat Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Naura Yanda Azzahra Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Surya Taufiq Shahniar Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36813/jplb.7.1.96-104
Keywords: valuation, economic value, clean water, watershed

Abstract

The existence of the Oyo Watershed provides many benefits to the people of Yogyakarta. The direct benefit of the Oyo Watershed is to meet the community's clean water needs. This benefit is considered to have economic value so that it can be measured in units of currency and needs to be assessed. The assessment of the watershed aims to determine the economic value of the Oyo Watershed which flows in Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta. The economic value is calculated using a market data-based approach and the replacement cost method. There are three alternatives used in the calculation, namely the cost of replacing the value of water in the form of water from PDAM production of IDR 177,896,643,185/year, the cost of clean water from tankers of IDR 2,928,668.050.000/year, and the cost of clean water from drilled wells of IDR 376,291,597,500/year. Of the three alternatives, the most cost-effective alternative is taken to replace the existence of the Oyo Watershed, resulting in an economic value of IDR 177,896,643,000/year (rounded up).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker J, Sheate WR, Phillips P and Eeales R. 2013. Ecosystem services in environmental assessment — Help or hindrance?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 40:3-13.
Barker R, Koppen BV and Shah T. 2000. A global perspective on water scarcity and poverty: Achievements and challenges for water resources management. International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Sri Lanka.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Gunungkidul. 2021. Kabupaten Gunungkidul Dalam Angka 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik. Kabupaten Gunungkidul.
Connor JA, Paquette S, McHugh T, Gie E, Hemingway M and Bianchi G. 2017. Application of natural resource valuation concepts for development of sustainable remediation plans for groundwater. Journal of Environmental Management 204(2):721-729.
Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil. 2020. Profil keluarga di Kabupaten Gunungkidul [internet]. Tersedia di: https://dukcapil.gunungkidulkab.go.id /2020/04/07/profil-keluarga-di-kabupaten-gunungkidul/.
Dorojati R, Astuti ND dan Hartono. 2016. Model pelayanan air bersih perdesaan. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 29(3):146-158.
Gabriel ME, Rezagama A dan Badrus A. 2017. Valuasi ekonomi lingkungan dampak abrasi menggunakan metode replacement cost, hedonic pricing, dan loss of income (studi kasus: Kelurahan Mangunharjo, Kecamatan Tugu, Kota Semarang). Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan 6(1):1-12.
Grey D and Sadoff CW. 2007. Sink or swim? water security for growth and development. Water Policy 9:545-571.
Hassan M, Afridi MK and Khan MI. 2019. Water security and environmental security in a national and regional context: envisioning environmental diplomacy for cooperation. Water Policy 21(6):1139-1161.
Ignatyeva M, Yurak V and Dushin A. 2022. Valuating natural resources and ecosystem services: systematic review of methods in use. Sustainability 14(3):1901.
Jackson S, Finn M and Scheepers K. 2014. The use of replacement cost method to assess and manage the impacts of water resource development on Australian indigenous customary economies. Journal of Environmental Management 135:100-109.
[KemenPUPR] Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. 2007. Pemakaian air rumah tangga perkotaan 144 L per hari [internet]. Tersedia di: https://pu.go.id/berita/pemakaian-air-rumah-tangga-perkotaan-144-L-perhari.
Lim SY, Park SY and Yoo SH. 2017. The environmental conservation value of the Saemangeum Open Sea in Korea. Sustainability 9(11):2-14.
Machado F, Silva L, Dupas F, Mattedi A, and Vergara F. 2014. Economic assessment of urban watersheds: developing mechanisms for environmental protection of the Feijão River, São Carlos - SP, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 74:677-684.
Nkiaka E. 2022. Exploring the socioeconomic determinants of water security in developing regions. Water Policy 24(4):608-625.
[PDAM] Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Tirta Handayani. 2018. Penetapan tarif dan ketentuan berlangganan air minum pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Tirta Handayani Kabupaten Gunungkidul [internet]. Tersedia di: https://pdamgunungkidul.co.id/.
PP (Peraturan Pemerintah) Nomor 37 Tahun 2012 tentang pengelolaan daerah aliran sungai.
JPLB, Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Published
2023-04-18
How to Cite
Benito, O., Purwaningrat, A., Azzahra, N., & Shahniar, S. (2023). Nilai manfaat ekonomi daerah aliran Sungai Oyo Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan (Journal of Environmental Sustainability Management), 7(1), 96-104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36813/jplb.7.1.96-104
Issue
JPLB, Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)