Valuasi nilai ekonomi daerah aliran sungai (DAS) Ciliwung dengan contingent valuation method

  • Obed Juan Benito Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Nanda Ayu Purbawati Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Naura Yanda Azzahra Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Agita Verlyana Syamsudin Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Raihan Bayu Aji Pangestu Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Surya Taufiq Shahniar Program Studi Diploma III PBB/Penilai, Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
Keywords: valuation, economic benefit value, watershed, contingent valuation method

Abstract

The Ciliwung Watershed is one of the watersheds that flows through Jakarta. The Ciliwung River has social and economic functions for the lives of the people around it as well as ecosystems for various organisms. However, this function has been increasingly eroded due to very severe river pollution. This condition is exacerbated by the use of riverbanks for the construction of residences, offices and other commercial areas that contribute to the increase of pollutants. Good management of the Ciliwung watershed is one of the important efforts made to improve the city of Jakarta. This study aims to assess the economic aspects of the Ciliwung watershed to support efforts to restore and manage the Ciliwung River in a sustainable manner. The economic value of this watershed was calculated using a non-market based approach and the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). Based on the valuation carried out, the estimated economic value of the Ciliwung watershed is IDR 991,000,000,000.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barton DN. 2002. The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 42:147-164.
Bateman I and Langford I. 1997. Non-users' willingness to pay for a national park: an application and critique of the contingent valuation method. Regional Studies 31(6):571-582.
Bettencourt P, Fulgencio C, Grade M and Wasserman JC. 2021. A comparison between the European and the Brazilian models for management and diagnosis of river basins. Water Policy 23(1):58-76.
Blomquist GC and Whitehead JC. 1998. Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation. Resource Energy and Economics 20(2):179-196.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta. 2021. Jumlah penduduk Provinsi DKI Jakarta menurut kelompok umur dan jenis kelamin 2019-2021 [internet]. Tersedia di: https://jakarta.bps.go.id/indicator/12/111/1/jumlah-penduduk-provinsi-dki-jakarta-menurut-kelompok-umur-dan-jenis-kelamin.html.
[DLH] Dinas Lingkungan Hidup DKI Jakarta. 2021. Kualitas air Sungai Ciliwung. Tersedia di: https://lingkunganhidup.jakarta.go.id/
Dolan F, Lamontagne J, Link R, Hejazi M, Reed P and Edmonds J. 2021. Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world. Nature Communications 12(1915):1-10.
Effendi H. 2003. Telaah kualitas air bagi pengelolaan sumber daya dan lingkungan perairan. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Ekaputra G, Yonariza and Wardiman D. 2021. Economic value of water yields on critical land conservation in Kuranji Watershed. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 757:012038.
Hariyadi S dan Effendi H. 2016. Diktat penentuan status kualitas perairan pesisir. Insitut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Hiemstra K, Van Vuren S , Vinke FSR, Jorissen RE and Kok M. 2022. Assessment of the functional performance of lowland river systems subjected to climate change and large scale morphological trends. International Journal of River Basin Management 20(1):45-56.
Kling CL, Phaneuf DJ and Zhao J. 2012. From Exxon to BP: has some number become better than no number?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4):3-26.
Sizya RR. 2015. Analysis of inter-household willingness to pay for solid waste management in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Journal of Resources Development and Management 4:57-67.
Tempo. 2021. Cegah banjir, DKI anggarkan Rp 1 triliun untuk normalisasi sungai dan waduk. Tersedia di: https://metro.tempo.co/read/1509792/cegah-banjir-dki-anggarkan-rp-1-triliun-untuk-normalisasi-sungai-dan-waduk
Tian K, Wang H and Wang Y. 2021. Investigation and evaluation of water literacy of urban residents in China based on data correction method. Water Policy 23(1):77-95.
[UI] Universitas Indonesia. 2013. Sungai Ciliwung kini [internet]. Tersedia di: https://www.ui.ac.id/sungai-ciliwung-kini-2/
Ukpai SN, Ojobor RG , Okogbue CO , Nnabo PN, Oha AI, Ekwe AC and Nweke MO. 2021. Socio-economic influence of hydrogeology in regions adjoining coal bearing formation: water policy in Anambra Basin. Water Policy 23(3):654-683.
UU (Undang-Undang) Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 tentang sumber daya air.
Wei C, Dong X, Yu D, Liu J, Reta G, Zhao W, Kuriqi A and Su B. 2022. An alternative to the grain for green program for soil and water conservation in the upper Huaihe River Basin, China . Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 43:101180.
Wulandari A, Fahrulraz MF, Doven FS dan Budyanra. 2019. Penerapan metode regresi logistik biner untuk mengetahui determinan kesiapsiagaan rumah tangga dalam menghadapi bencana alam (studi kasus di Provinsi Jawa Tengah tahun 2017). Seminar Nasional Official Statistics 2
Published
2023-04-18
How to Cite
Benito, O., Purbawati, N., Azzahra, N., Syamsudin, A., Pangestu, R., & Shahniar, S. (2023). Valuasi nilai ekonomi daerah aliran sungai (DAS) Ciliwung dengan contingent valuation method. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan (Journal of Environmental Sustainability Management), 7(1), 82-95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36813/jplb.7.1.82-95
Section
Articles