Mendesain kelembagaan perantara nasional untuk memobilisasi pendanaan iklim di Indonesia: studi kasus BPDLH
The Case Study of IEF
Keywords:
climate change, climate finance, indonesian environment fund, national intermediary
Abstract
Climate finance plays a critical role in addressing climate change issues. Global donors have provided substantial funding to support developing countries cope with climate change. However, due to the limited technical capabilities and high political interference risks in developing countries, donors face difficulties in disbursing their funds. Therefore, the government should set up a national intermediary to bridge the needs and expectations of the donors and local-level project beneficiaries. This intermediary will help mobilize more finance toward local-level projects pertaining to the attainment of the climate agenda. This study employs a qualitative method with a scoping review approach to analyze the most fundamental challanges faced by global donors in deploying their climate funds to developing countries. In addition, this study proposes alternative solutions for government to accelerate the mobilization of such funds. The government of Indonesia (GoI) has established a national intermediary called the Indonesian Environmental Fund (IEF) which operates under the Ministry of Finance. However, the IEF still faces various obstacles in carrying out its role. Further improvement will help enhance IEF’s capacity in fundraising, promoting blended finance and stenghthening project implementation capabilities at the local level.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Afful-Koomson T. 2015. The Green Climate Fund in Africa: what should be different? Climate and Development 7(4):367–379.
Agogué M, Yström A and Le Masson P. 2013. Rethinking the role of intermediaries as an architect of collective exploration and creation of knowledge in open innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 17(2).
Ampaire EL, Jassogne L, Providence H, Acosta M, Twyman J, Winowiecki L and van Asten P. 2017. Institutional challenges to climate change adaptation: a case study on policy action gaps in Uganda. Environmental Science and Policy 75:81–90.
Antimiani A, Costantini V, Markandya A, Paglialunga E and Sforna G. 2017. The Green Climate Fund as an effective compensatory mechanism in global climate negotiations. Environmental Science and Policy 77:49–68.
Bakici T, Almirall E and Wareham J. 2013. The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 25(3):311–327.
Bessant J and Rush H. 1995. Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24(1):97–114.
Bhandary RR, Gallagher KS and Zhang F. 2021. Climate finance policy in practice: a review of the evidence. Climate Policy 21(4):529–545.
Bowman M and Minas S. 2019. Resilience through interlinkage: the Green Climate Fund and climate finance governance. Climate Policy 19(3):342–353.
[BPDLH] Badan Pengelola Dana Lingkungan Hidup. 2021. Laporan tahunan tahun 2021 Badan Pengelola Dana Lingkungan Hidup [internet]. Tersedia di: https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Chaudhury A. 2020. Role of intermediaries in shaping climate finance in developing countries: lessons from the Green Climate Fund. Sustainability 12(12).
Choi Y. 2015. Intermediary propositions for green growth with sustainable governance. Sustainability 7(11):14785–14801.
[CNBC Indonesia] The Consumer News and Business Channel Indonesia. 2022. Jurus BPDLH efektifkan pengelolaan dana lingkungan hidup [internet]. Tersedia di: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20220929131950-8-375926/jurus-bpdlh-efektifkan-pengelolaan-dana-lingkungan-hidup
Coleman JS. 1986. Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology 91(6):1309–1335.
Cui L and Huang Y. 2018. Exploring the schemes for Green Climate Fund financing: international lessons. World Development 101:173–187.
Dasgupta D, Hourcade JC and Nafo S. 2019. A climate finance initiative to achieve the Paris Agreement and strengthen sustainable development. CIRED.
de Silva M, Howells J and Meyer M. 2018. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy 47(1):70–87.
Eyraud L, Clements B and Wane A. 2013. Green investment: trends and determinants. Energy Policy 60:852–865.
Fonta WM, Ayuk ET and van Huysen T. 2018. Africa and the Green Climate Fund: current challenges and future opportunities. Climate Policy 18(9):1210–1225.
Ikhtiarin AD, Agustin VM, Nethan A, Yuel MVDB, Wiratma HD dan Subandi Y. 2023. Dinamika kerja sama Indonesia – Norwegia di bidang lingkungan hidup melalui program Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) tahun 2017–2021. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial 7(1):56–65.
Jakob M, Steckel JC, Flachsland C and Baumstark L. 2015. Climate finance for developing country mitigation: blessing or curse? Climate and Development 7(1):1–15.
Kim H and Jun H. 2022. Can blended finance be a game changer in sustainable development? An empirical investigation of the “Lucas Paradox.” Sustainability 14(4).
Klerkx L and Leeuwis C. 2009. Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76(6):849–860.
Liebman A, Reynolds A, Robertson D, Nolan S, Argyriou M and Sargent B. 2019. Green finance in Indonesia: barriers and solutions. Asian Development Bank Institute. Tokyo.
Lounsbury M and Ventresca M. 2003. The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization 10(3):457–480.
MacCormick DN and Raz J. 1971. The concept of a legal system: an introduction to the theory of legal system. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Mafira T, Mecca B and Muluk S. 2020. Indonesia Environment Fund: bridging the financing gap in environmental programs. Climate Policy Initiative 9.
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A and Aromataris E. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 18(143):1–7.
Musiolik J, Markard J, Hekkert M and Furrer B. 2020. Creating innovation systems: how resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153.
Omukuti J, Barrett S, White PCL, Marchant R and Averchenkova A. 2022. The Green Climate Fund and its shortcomings in local delivery of adaptation finance. Climate Policy 22(9–10):1225–1240.
Parag Y and Janda KB. 2014. More than filler: middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out.” Energy Research and Social Science 3(C):102–112.
Pickering J and Mitchell P. 2017. What drives national support for multilateral climate finance? International and domestic influences on Australia’s shifting stance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 17(1):107–125.
Rode J, Pinzon A, Stabile MCC, Pirker J, Bauch S, Iribarrem A, Sammon P, Llerena CA, Muniz Alves L, Orihuela CE and Wittmer H. 2019. Why ‘blended finance’ could help deliver the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Research Letters 14(9):094001.
Tonkonogy B, Brown J, Micale V, Wang X and Clark A. 2018. Blended finance in clean energy: experiences and opportunities. Climate Policy Initiative. San Fransisco.
Winch GM and Courtney R. 2007. The organization of innovation brokers: an international review. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 19(6):747–763.
Yamineva Y. 2016. Climate finance in the Paris outcome: why do today what you can put off till tomorrow? Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 25(2):174–185.
Zhan JX and Santos-Paulino AU. 2021. Investing in the Sustainable Development Goals: mobilization, channeling, and impact. Journal of International Business Policy 4(1):166–183.
Agogué M, Yström A and Le Masson P. 2013. Rethinking the role of intermediaries as an architect of collective exploration and creation of knowledge in open innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 17(2).
Ampaire EL, Jassogne L, Providence H, Acosta M, Twyman J, Winowiecki L and van Asten P. 2017. Institutional challenges to climate change adaptation: a case study on policy action gaps in Uganda. Environmental Science and Policy 75:81–90.
Antimiani A, Costantini V, Markandya A, Paglialunga E and Sforna G. 2017. The Green Climate Fund as an effective compensatory mechanism in global climate negotiations. Environmental Science and Policy 77:49–68.
Bakici T, Almirall E and Wareham J. 2013. The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 25(3):311–327.
Bessant J and Rush H. 1995. Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24(1):97–114.
Bhandary RR, Gallagher KS and Zhang F. 2021. Climate finance policy in practice: a review of the evidence. Climate Policy 21(4):529–545.
Bowman M and Minas S. 2019. Resilience through interlinkage: the Green Climate Fund and climate finance governance. Climate Policy 19(3):342–353.
[BPDLH] Badan Pengelola Dana Lingkungan Hidup. 2021. Laporan tahunan tahun 2021 Badan Pengelola Dana Lingkungan Hidup [internet]. Tersedia di: https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Chaudhury A. 2020. Role of intermediaries in shaping climate finance in developing countries: lessons from the Green Climate Fund. Sustainability 12(12).
Choi Y. 2015. Intermediary propositions for green growth with sustainable governance. Sustainability 7(11):14785–14801.
[CNBC Indonesia] The Consumer News and Business Channel Indonesia. 2022. Jurus BPDLH efektifkan pengelolaan dana lingkungan hidup [internet]. Tersedia di: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20220929131950-8-375926/jurus-bpdlh-efektifkan-pengelolaan-dana-lingkungan-hidup
Coleman JS. 1986. Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology 91(6):1309–1335.
Cui L and Huang Y. 2018. Exploring the schemes for Green Climate Fund financing: international lessons. World Development 101:173–187.
Dasgupta D, Hourcade JC and Nafo S. 2019. A climate finance initiative to achieve the Paris Agreement and strengthen sustainable development. CIRED.
de Silva M, Howells J and Meyer M. 2018. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy 47(1):70–87.
Eyraud L, Clements B and Wane A. 2013. Green investment: trends and determinants. Energy Policy 60:852–865.
Fonta WM, Ayuk ET and van Huysen T. 2018. Africa and the Green Climate Fund: current challenges and future opportunities. Climate Policy 18(9):1210–1225.
Ikhtiarin AD, Agustin VM, Nethan A, Yuel MVDB, Wiratma HD dan Subandi Y. 2023. Dinamika kerja sama Indonesia – Norwegia di bidang lingkungan hidup melalui program Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) tahun 2017–2021. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial 7(1):56–65.
Jakob M, Steckel JC, Flachsland C and Baumstark L. 2015. Climate finance for developing country mitigation: blessing or curse? Climate and Development 7(1):1–15.
Kim H and Jun H. 2022. Can blended finance be a game changer in sustainable development? An empirical investigation of the “Lucas Paradox.” Sustainability 14(4).
Klerkx L and Leeuwis C. 2009. Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76(6):849–860.
Liebman A, Reynolds A, Robertson D, Nolan S, Argyriou M and Sargent B. 2019. Green finance in Indonesia: barriers and solutions. Asian Development Bank Institute. Tokyo.
Lounsbury M and Ventresca M. 2003. The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization 10(3):457–480.
MacCormick DN and Raz J. 1971. The concept of a legal system: an introduction to the theory of legal system. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Mafira T, Mecca B and Muluk S. 2020. Indonesia Environment Fund: bridging the financing gap in environmental programs. Climate Policy Initiative 9.
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A and Aromataris E. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 18(143):1–7.
Musiolik J, Markard J, Hekkert M and Furrer B. 2020. Creating innovation systems: how resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153.
Omukuti J, Barrett S, White PCL, Marchant R and Averchenkova A. 2022. The Green Climate Fund and its shortcomings in local delivery of adaptation finance. Climate Policy 22(9–10):1225–1240.
Parag Y and Janda KB. 2014. More than filler: middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out.” Energy Research and Social Science 3(C):102–112.
Pickering J and Mitchell P. 2017. What drives national support for multilateral climate finance? International and domestic influences on Australia’s shifting stance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 17(1):107–125.
Rode J, Pinzon A, Stabile MCC, Pirker J, Bauch S, Iribarrem A, Sammon P, Llerena CA, Muniz Alves L, Orihuela CE and Wittmer H. 2019. Why ‘blended finance’ could help deliver the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Research Letters 14(9):094001.
Tonkonogy B, Brown J, Micale V, Wang X and Clark A. 2018. Blended finance in clean energy: experiences and opportunities. Climate Policy Initiative. San Fransisco.
Winch GM and Courtney R. 2007. The organization of innovation brokers: an international review. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 19(6):747–763.
Yamineva Y. 2016. Climate finance in the Paris outcome: why do today what you can put off till tomorrow? Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 25(2):174–185.
Zhan JX and Santos-Paulino AU. 2021. Investing in the Sustainable Development Goals: mobilization, channeling, and impact. Journal of International Business Policy 4(1):166–183.
Published
2025-04-29
How to Cite
Lubis, R., & Firmansyah, A. (2025). Mendesain kelembagaan perantara nasional untuk memobilisasi pendanaan iklim di Indonesia: studi kasus BPDLH. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan (Journal of Environmental Sustainability Management), 9(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36813/jplb.9.1.15-35
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
_mini_size.jpg)
_10241.png){kind=logo}
